Showing posts with label French. Show all posts
Showing posts with label French. Show all posts

Friday, February 28, 2025

Best Pictures #114: 2024 (97th) Academy Awards Best Picture Nominee: Emilia Pérez

by A.J.

Best Pictures #114: 2024 (97th) Academy Awards Best Picture Nominee

Emilia Pérez


“Hello, very nice to meet you! I'd like to know about sex-change operation.”

Emilia Pérez received a stunning 13 Oscar nominations, including Best Picture, Director, Adapted Screenplay, and Best International Picture, becoming the most nominated foreign language film in the history of the Academy. It won the Special Jury prize at the Cannes Film Festival and received much critical praise. I cannot for the life of me understand why. Even aside from its controversies, including backlash from the transgender community and being offensive to the entire nation of Mexico, this is just a very bad movie on many levels. 

The controversy-free Zoe Saldaña plays Rita, a Mexican lawyer recruited by the drug lord Manitas to help facilitate their transition to female. Rita goes about finding a good and discreet surgeon and setting up safety nets for Manitas's wife, Jessi (Selena Gomez), and children since he will fake his death to fully become Emilia Pérez (Karla Sofía Gascón). Years later Emilia misses her children and has Rita arrange her return to Mexico City and bring Jessi and the children to live with her, now posing as Manitas's cousin. Emilia begins a romance with a woman widowed from cartel violence but when Jessi becomes involved with a former lover and wants to leave Mexico City with the children, trouble ensues.

Karla Sofía Gascón made Oscar history by becoming the first openly trans performer nominated for Best Actress–the goodwill for this accomplishment has since been soured by reporting on racist and hateful tweets followed by awkward non-apology statements. Off screen statements or actions aside, Emilia is a surprisingly bland character. After she transitions, Emilia is a benevolent figure. She starts an organization to locate the bodies of people missing and killed because of drug cartel violence. It does not come up that certainly some of these “disappeared” people are victims of Emilia’s past as a drug lord. She also retains and enjoys all of the wealth made in the drug trade. However, Emilia’s gentleness and benevolence last only as long as things are going her way. The idea that an unhappy and violent person may continue to be unhappy and violent even after they receive gender affirming treatment is brought up by the surgeon from Tel Aviv. This is an interesting idea, but it is not explored. The climax involves kidnapping, drug money, a big shoot out, and a car chase that could have been directed by Toonces the Driving Cat, because, you know, Latins are so hot blooded.

Of all the movie’s Oscar nominations Saldaña’s is the least perplexing, until you realize that is for Supporting Actress and Saldaña’s Rita is the main character. Selena Gomez stands out in a bad way but the fault is not entirely hers; her character has no personality or background or growth. Does Emilia react with shock at the thought of Jessi moving away with their children because Jessi is a bad mother or is it simply out of jealousy? We don’t see Jessi being a bad mother or a good mother. We don’t know if she was a party girl that never wanted to be a wife. She mentions to Emilia that she was afraid of Manitas but even this moment falls flat offering little insight into her past or present state of mind. 

Also this movie is a musical. I did not mention that until now because the movie itself barely cares about being a musical. There is good lively pacing at first but that stumbles when it becomes obvious that the movie could not decide if it should be sung through like The Umbrellas of Cherbourg or just have songs periodically. The Tel Aviv surgeon seems unable to figure out if he should sing in a traditional style or talk-sing like Rex Harrison in My Fair Lady. This is the result of bad direction. Somehow, two songs received Best Original Song nominations. El Mal is a big showy number, memorable because of Saldaña’s physicality while moving around tables and guests at a banquet. This is the song most like something from a Broadway musical. The other nominated song, Mi Camino, I only remember because at this point a bag of chips suddenly and mysteriously fell off the top of my refrigerator. For the most part the choreography is just as forgettable as most of the songs, if not just outright bad--especially for the song where Selena Gomez is just rolling around in her bed and messing about with pillows. When even I notice how bad the choreography is, something has gone terribly wrong.

Of course LGBTQ viewers and critics are better suited than I to speak about the film’s problems from that perspective though I can say with confidence that the screenplay uses transitioning like a soap opera plot device at best. There are so many other problems though and unfortunately the root seems to be the French director Jacques Audiard. Audiard does not speak Spanish or English; perhaps this accounts for the clunky dialogue and mistranslated swear words–you can confirm this with any 8-year-old with a Spanish last name–since the screenplay was presumably written in French, translated into Spanish, and then into English. He also admitted to doing little to no research about Mexican culture, wanting to use Mexico merely as a backdrop, and said that Spanish is a language of poor people and immigrants. It does not help that he cast non-Mexicans (two Americans, Saldaña and Gomez, and a Spaniard, Gascón) in the major roles. This is not necessarily a problem (a film like La Bamba, about the Chicano/Mexican-American Ritchie Valens stars people of Filipino, Puerto Rican, and Cuban background but that is hardly the flaw with that movie; Selena stars Jennifer Lopez, but don’t you dare say anything bad about Jennifer Lopez when she’s playing Selena) but it comes across as laziness on the part of the filmmakers–surely there exist 3 actress in Mexico who can sing and dance and act. I am not Mexican and I do not speak Spanish but I am of Mexican descent (3rd generation), a Chicano, or Hispanic, or Latin–though I cannot keep up with the ever changing terms, each claiming to be more correct than the last, so I identify as “whatever-white-people-call-us” and I am 100% not joking about that–and I grew up in South Texas so I have a strong sense for when a movie is legit about portraying Mexicans, or people of Mexican descent, or Mexican culture. Emilia Pérez is not legit. 

Statements from Audiard seem to suggest that he thinks the problems people have with Emilia Pérez are because it is so shocking. Positive reviews have also used adjectives like shocking, outrageous, audacious and compared it to the films of the Spanish master-filmmaker Pedro Almodóvar. This is a foolish and unworthy comparison. The films of Almodóvar (High Heels, Tie Me Up! Tie Me Down!, All About My Mother, Talk to Her, Bad Education, Broken Embraces to name a few) are most outrageous and audacious in the grandiose emotions on display, not simply their subject matter. If I want to see a movie set in Mexico, directed by a non-Mexican, starring a Spaniard that actually portrays the drug trade in a negative light and has a real show stopping musical number I will watch Robert Rodriguez’s Desperado.
Nominees: Pascal Caucheteux and Jacques Audiard, Producers
Director: Jacques Audiard
Screenplay: Jacques Audiard, Thomas Bidegain, Léa Mysius, Nicolas Livecchi
Cast: Zoe Saldaña, Karla Sofía Gascón, Selena Gomez
Production Companies: Why Not Productions, Page 114, Pathé, France 2 Cinéma, Saint Laurent Productions
Distributor: Pathé Distribution
Release Date: November 13th, 2024
Total Nominations: 13, including Best Picture
Other Nominations: Director-Jacques Audiard; Actress-Karla Sofía Gascón; Supporting Actress-Zoe Saldaña; Adapted Screenplay-Jacques Audiard, Thomas Bidegain, Léa Mysius, Nicolas Livecchi Paul Guilhaume on Le Bureau des Légendes S5e10 directed by Jacques Audiard; Cinematography-Paul Guilhaume; Editing-Juliette Welfling; International Feature Film-France; Makeup and Hairstyling-Julia Floch-Carbonel, Emmanuel Janvier, Jean-Christophe Spadaccini; Original Score-Clément Ducol, Camille; Original Song-Clément Ducol, Camille,Jacques Audiard For "El Mal"; Original Song-Clément Ducol, Camille For "Mi Camino"; Sound-Erwan Kerzanet, Aymeric Devoldère, Maxence Dussère, Cyril Holtz, Niels Barletta

Friday, October 25, 2024

13 Nights of Shocktober: Brotherhood of the Wolf

by A.J.

Night 7: Werewolf Party Night!
“Our people would not be afraid of a simple wolf. The beast is different.”

The French film Brotherhood of the Wolf is not precisely a werewolf movie. It is a little bit of all kinds of different movies: period piece, mystery, romance, action, thriller, horror, political intrigue, and, of course, kung fu. Also, it is based on a true story. Sort of. For several years during the 1760’s the rural province of Gevaudan was plagued by frequent, vicious attacks by a creature that survivors described as being like a wolf, but not a wolf. The death toll rose so severely (between 60 to 100 victims depending on the source) that King Louis XV sent royal hunters to catch the Beast of Gevaudan. Brotherhood of the Wolf, directed by Christophe Gans, who also co-wrote the screenplay with Stéphane Cabel, dramatizes this event, with extremely broad dramatic license. The result is a movie that looks like a serious epic in terms of cinematography, costumes, and production design, but is actually a big budget B-picture. At times it is absurd, thrilling, and suspenseful; at other times it is downright silly. What I mean by that is, if you don’t take this movie seriously, it is quite fun and entertaining. 
The story is told in flashback as a French aristocrat awaiting his doom from The Terror of the French Revolution uses his final moments to tell the true story of the Beast of Gevaudan. Then we flashback to 1764 and see a woman killed by the offscreen “beast” in a scene that plays like an over-the-top version of the opening of JAWS. Instead of a royal hunter, here King Louis XV sends knight and naturalist (biologist) Grégoire de Fronsac (Samuel Le Bihan), and his Iroquois companion, Mani (Mark Dacascos). Both are veterans of the Seven Years’ War (or French and Indian War as it was known in North America), which France and the Indians lost. After he finds a metal fang, Fronsac realizes that the beast is indeed no mere wolf but is something being controlled by someone. The conspiracy he uncovers involves a mysterious forest cult, suspicious nobles, an always suspicious Vincent Cassel, and, of course, the Vatican. It is all convoluted but the more outlandish this movie gets the more entertaining it gets. By the time a character reveals a monster-like arm, you’d be disappointed if they didn’t. 
Mani fits the cliché of the mostly silent, in tune with the spiritual and natural world Native American. It’s not the fullest portrayal of a Native American but in addition to great action scenes, Mani does have a backstory that fleshes out his character and his presence only enhances the movie. 
There is a camp value to certain things about Brotherhood of the Wolf that works in its favor. The hand-to-hand fight scenes are the most wildly anachronistic element of the whole movie, but they are very much in line with the martial arts inspired, highly choreographed style of a post-The Matrix action movie. Once revealed, the beast proves to be a decent monster, though the shots that use early 2000’s CGI look quite dated. However, even after the look of the beast is revealed the mystery deepens and continues to unfold. Whether it’s the over the top, out of place action scenes or the scenes of romance, intrigue, or horror, every scene works and somehow adds up to a coherent story and a very entertaining movie. 

Brotherhood of the Wolf is available to stream on Prime Video and Shudder and for free on Tubi, PlutoTV, and Kanopy.


Sunday, March 3, 2024

Best Pictures #100: 2023 (96th) Academy Awards Best Picture Nominee: Anatomy of a Fall

by A.J.

Best Pictures #100: 2023 (96th) Academy Awards Best Picture Nominee

“This is your own trap.”
Anatomy of a Fall feels like the kind of courtroom drama that Hollywood studios used to turn out in the 1980’s and 90’s. This winner of the prestigious Palme d’Or winner at the Cannes film Festival has gone on to international acclaim and relative box office success (for a foreign language film released in America anyway), and now has earned 5 Academy Award nominations including Best Picture, Best Actress for Sandra Hüller, Director for Justine Triet, Original Screenplay, and Editing. In its best moments it blends the drama of a murder trial, the tension of a mystery, and the emotions of a marital drama, which is impressive since one of the spouses dies right at the very beginning. This is essentially a legal procedural elevated by its embracing of uncertainty, great performances, and marital and family drama played not for sensation but to give the characters dimensions and complexity. 
German actress Sandra Hüller plays a successful author, also named Sandra, living with her French husband, Samuel (Samuel Theis), their son, Daniel, and dog, Snoop, in an isolated home in the snowy French countryside. Samuel dies from a mysterious fall out of the attic window. We do not see the fall. The only witness is 11-year-old Daniel (Milo Machado-Graner), who is visually impaired from an accident. It seems unlikely that Samuel just fell. Did Sandra push him? Did he commit suicide? Sandra’s high-profile trial, which is most of the 2 ½ hour film, digs up the drama and discord of her marriage that makes each scenario as likely as the other. 
Justine Triet’s direction and screenplay, co-written with Arthur Harari, never lean too far one way or the other about Sandra’s possible guilt or innocence. As soon as secrets are revealed and sympathies built for either Samuel or Sandra, the story slyly introduces doubt. Nearly every scene in the trial is underplayed in a way that lets tension creep in and build slowly. When a secret recording Samuel made of an argument the night before his death is played in court, the movie cuts to an extended flashback. This is Samuel Theis’s only significant scene and both he and Hüller are brilliant. The scene captures, maybe too well, the uneven ups and downs of a real argument: valid points mixed with petty sniping, shouting mixed with measured tones. Triet wisely cuts back to the courtroom right when the argument turns physical and we have to decide if we believe the prosecution or Sandra about the sounds of breaking dishes and slapping and hitting.
The French courtroom seems to be designed for maximum drama. The opposing lawyers and even Sandra are allowed to interrupt and cross-examine whenever opportune. Tangential speeches introducing hypothetical theories are made while a witness stands in the witness box in the background. Swann Arlaud as Vincent, Sandra’s lawyer, who is not entirely concerned with Sandra's innocence or guilt, is a great scene partner for her and a great verbal sparring partner for the zealous Advocate General, played by Antione Reinartz. Milo Machado-Graner has some key towards the climax and the young actor is more than up to the task. Even the Snoop the dog, played by Messi, does some impressive dog acting. 
It would be wrong to describe Anatomy of a Fall as a mystery because it is not so much concerned with solving Samuel’s mysterious death or proving Sandra’s innocence or guilt. It is more concerned with the doubt and uncertainty that can exist between people that are supposed to be the closest. Despite this, the style and structure are straightforward. The differing perspectives are made in the courtroom only through words; this is not a Rashomon tale where we see different points of view dramatized. Uncertainty looms over the entire story, even the ending, which though not ambiguous, still feels inconclusive in a way that may not satisfy all but fits the tone and themes. 

Friday, October 23, 2020

13 Nights of Shocktober: Eyes Without a Face

by A.J. 

This is my favorite time of year, second only to Christmas. Autumn has arrived, the weather is cooling down, and October becomes the month-long celebration of scary movies called Shocktober. So, in the days leading up Halloween I’ll be posting some horror movie recommendations to help you celebrate Shocktober.

Night 5: French Horror Night: 
“My face frightens me. My mask frightens me even more.”
Eyes Without a Face
There’s a good argument that the 1960 French film Eyes Without a Face is more of a thriller with horror elements than an all-out horror movie. However you classify it, Eyes Without a Face is a peculiar film with haunting imagery. Since its addition to the Criterion Collection and late-night airings on TCM, it has become almost like required viewing for fans of classic horror and international horror films. Eyes Without a Face could qualify as “arthouse horror,” or "elevated horror," but watching it isn’t like doing homework. Eyes Without a Face is its own brand of horror.
After a car accident disfigures Christiane (Edith Scob), her father, Dr. Genessier (Pierre Brasseur), a renowned plastic surgeon, fakes her death and keeps her locked away at their country estate. He makes her wear an expressionless white mask and conducts experimental surgeries to restore her face. Dr. Genessier is acting entirely on his own wishes, not his daughter's; he mentions briefly that he is responsible for the accident that maimed her. Dr. Genessier’s loyal and murderous assistant, Louise (Alida Valli), preys on young women to lure to the chateau for the doctor to use in his experiments. Christiane wants none of this, but she is a prisoner in her own home.
There are elements of body horror in Eyes Without a Face though it is not as graphic or explicit as the modern era films of David Cronenberg or Guillermo Del Toro. However, there is a prolonged scene of surgery where a girl’s face is removed that is graphic and gross. It is not played for sensation but coldly and clinically without any background music and very few cuts. The horror of the scene comes from its context. There is nothing sadistic to the surgery, Dr. Genessier is just doing his work. The final moments of the film are filled with eerie and creepy imagery beautifully shot in stark black and white.
This is a good film to watch with someone that doesn’t like horror movies but wants to watch something spooky. It is totally unlike anything resembling a conventional horror movie. There are no pop-up scares. The villains are not especially devilish or sadistic. The climax where Christiane finally takes agency of her own fate is played low-key. There is a detached feeling between the film and its macabre subject matter. It also has the structure of a mystery/thriller though we the audience know every angle of the story. Christiane’s fiancé believes she is still alive and detectives are on the case of the missing girls, but these elements are in the far background.
Eyes Without a Face straddles the thriller and horror genres and also the classic and modern film eras. The unsensational, almost documentary-like approach to the story and characters lean towards the trends and style of the French New Wave being pioneered at the time by Francois Truffaut and Jean-Luc Godard. The score, however, is firmly rooted in the older era of filmmaking and feels too jaunty at times for what is happening on screen. The Criterion Collection, dedicated to highlighting notable classic and modern films, has few horror films in its library. I'm glad this is one of them.