Showing posts with label Horror of Dracula. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Horror of Dracula. Show all posts

Saturday, October 19, 2019

13 Nights of Shocktober: The Mummy (1959)

by A.J.

This is my favorite time of year, second only to Christmas. Autumn has arrived, the weather is cooling down, and October becomes the month-long celebration of scary movies called Shocktober. There are a lot of horror movies out there, but as a genre, horror is still looked down upon by some mainstream critics and moviegoers. It doesn’t help that, admittedly, there are so few quality horror movies made but, like comedy, it’s a very difficult and subjective genre. So, in the days leading up Halloween I’ll be posting some recommendations for scary movies to help you celebrate Shocktober.

Night 1: Hammer Horror Night
“He who robs the graves of Egypt dies!”
The Mummy (1959)  
Beginning in the late 1950’s, the British film production company Hammer began making a series of horror films that were essentially remakes of the Universal Monster movies of the 1930’s. The Hammer films had different storylines and monster designs, however, being in technicolor and showing more explicit violence and sexuality is what made them a distinct brand. The Curse of Frankenstein kicked off the Hammer Horror cycle in 1957, followed by Dracula (released in the U.S. as Horror of Dracula) in 1958, and tonight’s recommendation, The Mummy in 1959. Each film spawned numerous sequels—some more entertaining than others—but none matched the first in their respective series, all of which were directed by Terence Fisher and paired the great actors Peter Cushing and Christopher Lee.
The plot is pretty straightforward. In the 1890’s, a father and son archeologist team discover the tomb of the legendary Princess Ananka. The son, John (Cushing), has a broken leg, so he is not present when his father reads from a mysterious scroll and witnesses something that drives him mad. An Egyptian man named Mehemet (George Pastell), a disciple of the god Karnak, follows the father and son to England to exact revenge for desecrating Ananka’s tomb. Mehemet’s weapon of choice is... you guessed it, a mummy.
The Hammer Horror films usually cast Peter Cushing as the protagonist and Christopher Lee as the monster. When Lee began his acting career, he had difficulty getting good roles because of his imposing size, a commanding 6’5”. It’s easy to understand why he was cast as Frankenstein’s Monster, Dracula (his best horror role), and the mummy. While the mummy is a thrilling screen presence, he is not a very interesting monster since he is just the tool for Mehemet’s revenge. When the mummy sees that John’s wife, Isobel (Yvonne Furneaux), resembles the Princess Ananka, he begins to act on his own will. The mummy’s silent, lumbering nature leaves Lee only his eyes to act with and he does a pretty good job when he gets a close up. In a flashback narrated by Cushing we see that the mummy was a priest named Kharis that was obsessed with Ananka and attempted to bring her back to life. Lee gets to use his voice and whole body in the flashback. It’s a brief scene but it’s good to see Lee really play a character. Thanks to Lee’s large size, it is easy to believe that this mummy could pick up someone by neck with one hand or burst through doors and windows, the only way the mummy enters a room. When he and Cushing fight, it doesn’t seem like much of a contest—thankfully, just then the mummy catches sight of Isobel.
Cushing and Pastell have a good scene together when John visits his suspicious new neighbor. Mehemet is the main antagonist of the movie, more so than the mummy, but his revenge is not without good reason. He is not wrong that English archaeologists are desecrating sacred tombs and disregarding another culture’s customs, just so people can stare at relics in the British Museum. John’s counter argument is that nothing would be known of the ancient Egyptian people or their culture if it were left sealed and buried. However, everything else he says is purposefully condescending and insulting as he is trying to provoke Mehemet.
Like all Hammer Horror movies, the period sets and costumes, especially the ancient Egyptian sets and costumes, look obviously fake. However, this only helps create the movie’s fantasy atmosphere. The bog nearby John’s country estate is a fun set. Seeing the mummy in the dark, soupy water is a great sight. The look of the mummy is pretty spooky—wrapped in bandages that are dirty and tattered and look a thousand years old—especially with Lee’s eyes behind the costume. Though, I’m pretty sure you can the line for a zipper on the back of the mummy in certain scenes. 
The top tier Hammer Horror films, in which I would include The Mummy, are great Shocktober viewings because they are fun horror entertainment, but not so scary as to be intimidating. Whether you are a bit squeamish or a die-hard horror fan, the Hammer Horror version of The Mummy will help you have a great Halloween.

Monday, October 26, 2015

13 Nights of Shocktober: Horror of Dracula

by A.J.

This is my favorite time of year, second only to Christmas. Autumn has arrived, the weather is cooling down, and October becomes the month long celebration of scary movies called Shocktober. There are a lot of horror movies out there, but as a genre, horror is still looked down upon by some mainstream critics and moviegoers. It doesn’t help that, admittedly, there are so few quality horror movies made but, like comedy, it’s a very difficult and subjective genre. So, in the days leading up Halloween I’ll be posting some recommendations for scary movies to help you celebrate Shocktober.

Night 8: Christopher Lee Memorial Night, "He'll Hold You In A Grasp of Shock!"

Horror of Dracula
The passing of movie icon Christopher Lee earlier this year was very sad news, but he left us with many, many films to enjoy. He had a long and impressive career that included both the Star Wars and Lord of the Rings film series. However, his most famous role is unquestionably as Dracula in a series of movies for the British production company Hammer. When people think of Dracula, they either picture Bela Lugosi or Christopher Lee. The first film in which Lee took on the already legendary character was in 1958 with Horror of Dracula, co-starring fellow horror movie icon and superb actor Peter Cushing, and directed by Terence Fisher. When Terence Fisher, Peter Cushing, and Christopher Lee made a film together for Hammer, audiences were in for a treat.
Horror of Dracula is a loose remake of Todd Browning’s Dracula from 1931, and an even looser adaptation of the Bram Stoker novel. The movie begins with bright red blood dripping on Dracula’s tomb. Jonathan Harker arrives at Castle Dracula in Klausenburg to work as the librarian for the Count, but he is actually a vampire hunter and protégé of Dr. Van Helsing. Harker becomes trapped in the castle and succeeds in killing the Count’s bride, but not Dracula himself. Dracula seeks revenge by first trying to take Harker’s fiancé, Lucy, for his new bride, and then Lucy’s sister, Mina. Van Helsing is on Harker’s trail and tries to save Lucy and Mina and put an end to the sinister vampire. Almost none of this happens in the novel. It is almost like Dracula fan fiction. It takes the already existing characters and then just makes up a different story and does what it thinks is most entertaining, and it is indeed very entertaining.
Horror of Dracula was impressive when it was released because, like other Hammer horror films, it ups the ante on violence, action, and sexuality. That means that when someone gets stabbed or bitten we see blood, Dracula’s bride wears a dress revealing her cleavage, and Lee plays Dracula as a dangerous seducer. This film was shot on Technicolor so the colors of the sets and costumes are rich and vivid, and red blood is especially red. All of those elements are still entertaining today, but the reason this film works, then and now, is because of its reinterpretation of Count Dracula and Dr. Van Helsing and the screen presence of Christopher Lee and Peter Cushing. Lee’s tall stature of 6’5” and natural physical appearance give his Dracula a commanding and imposing presence. Lee's Dracula exudes menace. The danger and threat he poses are immediate and ever present. In one scene Lee bounds across a large dining room and over a table to pull his bride away from attacking Harker. Other versions of Dracula usually give him servants to do his bidding, but this Dracula drives his own carriage and digs a grave for Mina himself. This is a take charge, action Dracula. In other words, a this is a badass Dracula, and Christopher Lee has the talent to make it believable. 
The only match for a badass, action Dracula is a badass, action Van Helsing and that's what Peter Cushing gives us. He makes his first appearance in the movie wearing a very cool, very boss fur collared coat and bowler hat. We spend most of the movie with Van Helsing as he tracks down Dracula. Cushing's performance and screen presence keeps those scenes interesting and entertaining. He believably portrays Van Helsing as learned scholar and fearless vampire hunter. He springs into action too: he leaps over a railing and runs upstairs when he hears someone removed the garlic from Lucy's bedroom. The climactic confrontation between Van Helsing and Dracula does not disappoint; it's action packed and all the while Van Helsing wears his boss coat.
Some people might find Horror of Dracula campy, but it is undeniably entertaining. There is great scenery and the production design does a good job at setting the mood for a Gothic vampire tale set in a far away land. Not every bit of scenery looks completely real but the hint of artificiality only adds to the fantasy element of the movie. Horror of Dracula is a fun movie from beginning to end and never gets too intense or gross so even squeamish people can enjoy the movie. The blood and horror effects are tame by today's standards but hold up pretty well. There's something for everyone to enjoy in Horror of Dracula, whether you are a horror movie buff or only watch horror movies at Halloween.