Sunday, October 20, 2019

13 Nights of Shockotber: Freaks

by A.J.

This is my favorite time of year, second only to Christmas. Autumn has arrived, the weather is cooling down, and October becomes the month-long celebration of scary movies called Shocktober. So, in the days leading up Halloween I’ll be posting some scary movie recommendations to help you celebrate Shocktober.

Night 2: Classic Horror Night
“We accept her, we accept her. One of us, one of us. Gooble-gobble, gooble-gobble.”
The cult classic horror film Freaks remains as controversial today as when it was first released in 1932. The film was so reviled, even by MGM, the studio that produced it, that it effectively killed the career of director Todd Browning, who only a year before directed the horror classic Dracula. Browning had directed Dracula for Universal, so MGM production chief Irving Thalberg wanted him to create a horror hit for MGM and gave him complete creative freedom. No one expected anything like Freaks.
It should be made clear upfront that Freaks is a horror movie because of its murder/revenge plot, not because of its cast of real-life circus sideshow performers with disabilities. The film opens with a circus barker introducing a new sideshow “freak.” He explains that she was once a beautiful trapeze artist, but she violated the code of the “freaks”: offend one, and you offend them all. The plot centers on Hans (Harry Earles), a wealthy little person, who becomes totally infatuated with Cleopatra (Olga Baclanova), a beautiful trapeze performer. He leaves Frieda, his fiancĂ©, for Cleopatra, who is only interested in his money. In fact, she plots with the circus strongman, Hercules, to kill Hans. When Hans becomes suspiciously ill immediately after the wedding, his fellow sideshow performers plot revenge against Cleopatra and Hercules.
Though Freaks is a Pre-Code film (made before movies were subject to extremely strict, puritanical censorship), 30 minutes of footage was ordered cut by MGM studio head Louis B, Mayer, who hated the film, leaving the final runtime at just over an hour. Some of the scenes cut were deemed too shocking or disturbing, like the fate of the strongman, who is castrated and becomes part of the sideshow as a soprano singer. No one knows for sure the content of the rest of the cut scenes, but it is likely they were just more scenes of the lives of the sideshow performers. As it is, most of Freaks focuses on the close-knit sideshow community, with the murder/revenge plot kicking in only in the final act.
It may be only an hour long, but Freaks takes its time building characters and giving them inner lives. We spend a little time with each member of the sideshow, allowing some to show off their act. The most memorable act has to Randion “The Living Torso” lighting his own cigarette despite not having any limbs. The conjoined twins Violet and Daisy get along well, but Daisy’s fiancĂ© and Violet do not, leading to some amusing moments. The most famous scene from Freaks is their tradition of “The Loving Cup.” After Hans and Cleopatra’s wedding, the sideshow members take turns drinking champagne from a large bowl while chanting “We accept her, we accept her.” When it is Cleopatra’s turn to drink from the bowl she reveals her true nature and disgust for them.  
This was likely the first time that people with disabilities were actually cast in a Hollywood production. Some of the performers later expressed regret at being in the movie or ended up hating the film. Unfortunately, during production the disabled performers were treated nearly as poorly as their characters in the movie. Wallace Ford as Phroso the clown and Leila Heims as Venus the seal trainer, the only able-bodied circus performers that are kind to the sideshow performers, received top billing though they are more supporting players. Worst of all, the disabled performers were not allowed to eat at the studio cafeteria since their appearance might upset the other MGM staff, so they had to eat outside under a tent set up just for them.
Freaks will likely always be controversial—does it have sympathy for its subjects throughout, or does it squander that sympathy by having them be violent and vengeful? The final scene seems like it was tacked on as an attempt to give the movie a happy ending. It only half works. This is a dark film but also a very interesting one deserving of classic status.

No comments:

Post a Comment