Showing posts with label Shadow of the Vampire. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Shadow of the Vampire. Show all posts

Monday, October 31, 2016

13 Nights of Shocktober: Shadow of the Vampire (2000)

by A.J.

Happy Halloween! The countdown is over and Halloween is finally upon us. Tonight, hopefully, you'll be relaxing, eating some candy, and watching a scary, or not-so-scary, movie. There are a lot of options for tonight and I hope I've been of some help. Here is my final recommendation to help bring an end to Shocktober:

Night 13: Happy Happy Halloween!
“He’s a Stanislavsky lunatic! That’s what’s wrong with him!”


The idea behind Shadow of a Vampire is a novel and clever one: director F.W. Murnau found a real vampire to star in his 1922 silent horror masterpiece, Nosferatu. As you can imagine, this would cause problems with the shoot. Shadow of the Vampire is not just a horror movie, or a vampire movie, it is about the creation of one of the most important and scariest horror films ever made. Nosferatu is still a chilling and unsettling film to watch. Shadow of the Vampire exists in the shadow of Nosferatu, but it is no less a creative, creepy, and spooky film.

John Malkovich plays German director F.W. Murnau, an auteur if there ever was one. Only a real vampire can satisfy his need for authenticity and desire to make a film that transcends entertainment and becomes immortal art. He is addressed by his crew as “herr doctor” and poetically pontificates about cinema and art. On the train ride to the shooting location in Czechoslovakia he says, “we are scientists engaged in the creation of memory, but our memory will neither blur nor fade.”
When the production leaves the safety and control of the studio in Berlin they finally meet the mysterious character actor Max Schreck who is to play the vampire. Schreck’s methods are “unconventional” and his background is hard to pin down. Murnau claims that Schreck studied with Stanislavsky, the Russian who pioneered acting techniques that would become known in modern times as “the method.” Schreck will only appear in full makeup, will remain in character for the entire shoot, and will only shoot his scenes at night.

Willem Dafoe plays the vampire in question, who Murnau introduces to the cast and crew as Max Schreck. The real Max Schreck gave one of the most chilling and iconic performances in horror film history. If you’ve never Nosferatu, you’d likely still recognize the pale vampire or his stiff silhouette and strangely long knifelike fingers. At all times he seems otherworldly and monstrous. Schreck so disappears into the character of Count Orlok that is not difficult to accept the idea that he might have been a real vampire.
Portraying Schreck’s vampire in a movie about the making of Nosferatu is a tall order, but Dafoe is more than up to task. For his superb performance Dafoe received an Oscar nomination for Best Supporting Actor. Dafoe, still slightly recognizable under all that vampire makeup, also disappears into his role as the vampire. He plays Schreck with a dark sense of humor. This vampire seems to be aware of the absurdity of being a vampire pretending to be an actor pretending to be vampire. However humorous Dafoe undeniably is as Schreck, he is also menacing and chilling. In one scene he answers the questions of two drunk crew members about being a vampire. They think he is being "in character," but his answers are simultaneously unnerving and melancholy. Schreck’s payment for participating in the shoot is the lead actress, Gretta (Catherine McCormack).

Crew members fall mysteriously ill and the rest of the cast and crew are uneasy around Schreck. As the vampire feeds off the crew he jeopardizes the production which infuriates Murnau. Malkovich plays Murnau as an artist obsessed. He is willing to achieve his vision at all costs. His interactions with Dafoe as Schreck result in some darkly comedic scenes. Murnau condescends to Schreck and Schreck is mischievous and petulant. Shadow of the Vampire is a movie about making movies, a favorite genre of mine, and there is some good showbiz humor. Murnau yells at Schreck for feeding on the cinematographer, “why not the script girl?” Later in the movie Schreck suggests that the writer is no longer necessary. In one scene, Eddie Izzard, playing one of the actors in the film within a film, accidentally cuts his finger for real in a scene with Schreck only to be attacked by the crazed character actor. Izzard’s character shouts, “He’s a Stanislavsky lunatic! That’s what’s wrong with him!”

Several memorable scenes and images from Nosferatu are recreated in Shadow of the Vampire. The film does not draw unnecessary attention to these scenes and they match same spooky tone and atmosphere of the rest of the movie. Dafoe’s vampire in the recreated scenes is equally as striking and frightening as the real Schreck’s vampire. The supporting cast is outstanding and includes: Eddie Izzard, Cary Elwes, Catherine McCormack, and Udo Keir.
This film does an excellent job creating an eerie, portentous atmosphere transporting you to another time and place that feels paradoxically ethereal and all too real. There is very little blood and gore. Instead of a few horrific set pieces, Shadow of the Vampire opts for a sustained ominous mood punctuated by the presence of a monster. Directed by E. Elias Merhige and written by Steven Katz, Shadow of the Vampire is an homage to a landmark horror film and also an effective horror film in its own right.

Friday, October 8, 2010

Vampires Used to be Scary

It's Halloween season and one of my favorite times of year. The weather finally cools down and it's time to watch scary movies. That means I won't be watching any movies (or TV shows) with vampires because vampires aren't scary anymore. What's happened to the vampire is rather undignified for a creature that has haunted and terrified but also intrigued every civilization for hundreds if not thousands of years. They've gone from demons of the night to PG-13 leading men and heartthrobs. I've never really been a big vampire fan but that just seems wrong. It's a well known fact that anything 12 year-old girls fawn over can't be scary.

I remember not wanting to watch movies like From Dusk Til Dawn, Bram Stoker's Dracula, and even The Lost Boys because they had vampires and vampires were the stuff of horror movies. I recently watched The Lost Boys and while it's not scary like you typically think of a horror movie being scary, it is an entertaining movie about vampires. The third act where the vampires attack the house the main characters are holed up in is like a demented version of Home Alone. The teenage vampires act how teenagers would act if they were immortal, had superpowers, and pretty much no consequences for their actions. They enjoy being vampires and don't act like moody emo kids. The gang of vampires in The Lost Boys has the allure and intrigue that makes teenagers turn goth, sells Anne Rice books, and was first put on the screen by Bela Lugosi. Lugosi is the ultimate Dracula; dangerous, but appealing in spite of, or because of, that fact. But even before Tod Browning's 1931 version of Dracula, the vampire appeared as a monster, not a lover, in F.W. Murnau's silent film Nosferatu. If you haven't seen Nosferatu, I highly recommend giving it a watch. It's not only one of the first and best of the horror genre, but also one of the great movies of the silent era. It's creepy and haunting and perfect for watching late at night.

Despite the German poster shown above giving it a 4 fedora rating, I think Bram Stoker's Dracula (Francis Coppola's 1990 version) is largely underrated and overlooked. Of course it won't hold up when compared to Tod Browning's 1931 classic version, but it does just fine as its own version of Bram Stoker's novel. In this version especially, we see the vampire as both a monster and alluring lover. I don't find the presence of Keanu Reeves or Winona Ryder distracting and I think Anthony Hopkins' performance as Dr. Van Helsing is so over the top it's great; it makes Van Helsing an eccentric jerk which is a great spin on the character. Coppola's Dracula uses a lot of in-camera effects and old fashioned, low-tech special effects and it gives the movie the creepy, spooky feel of older horror movies that had to rely on mood and atmosphere to effect the audience. It also has one of the spookiest and craziest movie scores I've ever heard.
Interview with the Vampire is where the vampire becomes less of a monster and more sentimental - which is the point of the movie: how do you deal with going from life as a human to life as a vampire? It's an effective movie that again relies on mood and atmosphere, which is helped by the period setting. It lets us in on the "realities" of life as a vampire that other movies don't touch on. The vampires are still fearsome, though the emphasis is on the allure of the undead creature. I don't view 2008's Let the Right One In so much as a vampire movie as a movie about two lonely people, one of whom just happens to be a vampire. I thought it was one of the best movies of 2008 and was disappointed to hear that an American version was being made. The TV spots make the remake look better than I was expecting it to be and I'll probably check it out before Halloween, if only to see how it was adapted for American audiences.
For my money, the last good vampire-as-monster movie was 2000's Shadow of the Vampire. It tells the fictional story of the making of F.W Murnau's Nosferatu, in which Murnau (played by John Malkovich) hires a real vampire, Max Shrek (played by Willem Dafoe) to give his film a truly authentic feel. Dafoe gives an incredible and chilling performance as the monstrous vampire and even received an Oscar nomination. Shrek begins to feed off of the crew and cast and Murnau struggles to gain control of the undead beast and finish his movie. It's a great vampire movie, but it's also a movie about making movies, a favorite genre of mine. Shrek can't help being a vampire which is jeopardizing the movie production. Murnau keeps the production going even though he's risking the lives of his cast and crew because he can't help what he is either, a filmmaker.